I actually kind of prefer the latter as you get the image in Photoshop immediately.ĮDIT: Download from Nikon. I've run Nikon Scan both as stand-alone software and as a plug-in in Photoshop CS2 and CS4. When I first got my Coolscan 8000, I was running the whole set-up on a dual 2.7 G5(fastest PPC for that software since it's single threaded) but even that gets sluggish with a full resolution scan of a 6圆, much less 6x7. I have it on a PCIe SSD and it's quick to say the least. I've done a lot of scanning with Nikon Scan on my Mac Pro 5,1 running Snow Leopard. It will control all the USB and Firewire scanners(which means the 4000, V/5000, 8000, and 9000) and is Carbon so will run in OS X or OS 9. If it's not on the Garden I'll put it there(I need to upload a bunch of old photo software there since some is getting impossible to find). If not, it certainly out there and you may still be able to find it on Nikon's website. I bought my first Vuescan license in 2007 to run the Canon flatbed I was then using, and used it for a long time but when I started using the Nikon scanners and comparing side-by-side I gave up on Vuescan even though I knew my way around it well at that point.Ĭlick to expand.I think I put it on the Garden at one point. NikonScan isn't as user friendly as VueScan, but the results are worth it especially given that you get real Digital ICE and not Vuescan's version of it. Unfortunately virtualization won't work with your 4000 as you can't pass through Firewire to a VM. Last thing-you have PPC Macs, don't you? I'd highly, highly recommend not messing with Vuescan and instead just use Nikon Scan on PPC(or on an Intel Mac running Snow Leopard). It's not a terrible job and doesn't require disassembly beyond removing the cover from what I remember, but does need a lot of care as the scanner is pretty well junk if you scratch the mirror. It was a night and day difference after I cleaned the mirror in particular, although the lenses need it too. The results from my III when I first got it, although it mostly showed as low contrast and haloing. I don't necessarily see this in your scans, but the optics can get dirty in these Nikon scanners. With scanners you have the benefit of being able to adjust it on the front end before capture, so use that and get what you want before scanning. Certainly I've not seen them from VueScan or from NikonScan. If scanner RAW files exist, I don't know that I've ever seen them. my 8000 that I often entertain the idea of getting a 9000(then drop it when I look at prices).Īs for file formats-if I want to maximize image quality I usually scan in TIFF, although in the real world I tend to not see a lot of difference between TIFF and JPEG. I see enough difference between 35mm scans on thin negatives from my V vs. If you do end up dealing with a lot of less than great negatives, the Coolscan V and 9000 actually made significant improvements in this over the 4000/8000. Usually on negative film this shows up more in the shadows than the highlights, but it's there. When you scan underexposed, or "thin" negatives you can end up with a lot of noise. Looks not unlike grain to me, but I'd also be interested in seeing your negatives(just a photo of your negatives, not scans). Excuse the actual content, I accept my focus isn't great in these two, but there is a lot of sky to judge how accurate the scans came out. This is NEW, non-expired Kodak Gold 200 shot and developed at box speed this year. If you have experience with VueScan, what is your process for the best scans? Yes, I am aware of and use Negative Lab Pro but the Creative Cloud crap makes me nauseous. Would that be RAW? What bit-depth? Do I use the multi-exposure scan setting and combine the two images?Īperture doesn't have a means to invert negatives, so RAW negs adds a major step since I'm trying to limit my process to within Leopard. Ideally, I'd like to find a setting that gives me low-noise high-DPI scans with enough range that my developing software can do the rest of the work manually. Basically, the sky or dark spots of these images looks like somebody sprinkled the dust from the bottom of a Froot-Loops box all over it. My images resulting from VueScan just have terrible noise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |